This deviant's full pageview
graph is unavailable.
Banned Deviant
I am a Deviant of Many Talents
hunnybunny69
United States
Why I Am Here
No reason given yet
Last Visit: 282 weeks ago
FUCK the DA NAZI HYPOCRITES!
Art Zone
Personal Zone
Misc. Zone
This is the place where you can personalize your profile!
But, how?
By moving, adding and personalizing widgets.
You can drag and drop to rearrange.
You can edit widgets to customize them.
The left side has widgets you can add!
Some widgets you can only access when you get a premium membership.
Some widgets have options that are only available when you get a premium membership.
We've split the page into zones!
Certain widgets can only be added to certain zones.
"Why," you ask? Because we want profile pages to have freedom of customization, but also to have some consistency. This way, when anyone visits a deviant, they know they can always find the art in the top left, and personal info in the top right.
Don't forget, restraints can bring out the creativity in you!
Now go forth and astound us all with your devious profiles!
I'm sorry you had to leave. I will miss the work and good humor.
--
Hey, next time you watch Who Framed Roger Rabbit, look at all the cartoons very carefully, you can see right through them :gasps: (only on the vhs version)
vest STFU!!! If you don't like this form of art then don't comment on it. I seen you thrash Gnight around and let me tell you if you don't like WG then don't even look at it in the first place. I don't know how you even got the adresses in to the WG communty in the first place on DA. Maybe I don't want to know. But still man you shoude not even comment on this stuff if you don't like it.
--
Chief Wiggum: Um, what does it say on my badge? Cash bribes only! Lets go.
"basically told me as a word of advice that if i wanted to keep my account i needed to just shut my mouth and not question the admins."
All I said to you was this:
He had submitted work that had previously been deleted by other admins, after many warnings. I don't think they will allow him back.
-- ...a pathetic, adolescent fantasy which doesn't take into account the immense amount of responsibility and effort required to rule over an empire larger than any other.
But here's what I find strange.....
A guy draws a fat purple hippoe and gets banned but someone can post bondage pics of pierced nipples and that's ok.
Maybe you better explain to me in plain english what's going on. Far be it from me to piss of the great DA gods, but it just seems to me that if the admins don't like you, they pretty much will fuck with you at their leisure.
And I'm just an observer. This is what I've seen. I know the story (Most of it to form my own opinion at any rate) and everything that I have ever learned about art is diffrent here. Am I wrong to belive that a persons interpretation of beauty or emotion or thought is wrong? Is there only one kind of appreation?
I myself write all kinds of thing. Some of the things I wrote are on the erotic end of the spectrum. But I do not see it as pornographic. I see it as an exercise in imagination whereby a charicter expresses sexuality. Is that wrong? If it is, then perhaps I could write about my breakfeast, me watching tv, playing video games, going to work. Mundane things everybody does. OR, perhaps I could write about cannabalisim, genocide, attrocities of war. Is THAT art?
The line is blurred here. There are people on both sides of that line that are confused about what is acceptable and what isn't. People are getting banned for the very same reason why art exists, exploring imagination. It just seems so wrong to me that people get banned for insipid things while other people continue to post things that, if posted by anyone else, would be considered pornographic.
Now, these make for an ill comparison, as the first depicts masturbation, correct? Which is a sexual act, not supported by Policy, is that not true? There is no argument there, as the second depicts no sexual act.
This shouldn't really require any more clarification...seems like a no-brainer to me. ;confused:
-- ...a pathetic, adolescent fantasy which doesn't take into account the immense amount of responsibility and effort required to rule over an empire larger than any other.
Oh Please, By poining out something and then making like that matter is beyond obvious even if I question it is an insult to my intelligence. You're probably gonna ban me now because I questioned policy. But if I get banned for questing policy, then what of the other people that violate olicy all the time by hiding their "art" behind clever terminology or so much bullshit that it could fertilize a corn field for an entire year? What about them?
I could post pictures of children being mutilated. I won't because I don't belive in it and to me it isn't art. But to someone else, it is.
No, I'm not going to bany you just because you spoke to me.
Well, like I said I thought it was a no-brainer, clearly you didn't so I had to explain it a bit more simply. If you feel that this is insulting your intelligence then maybe you should just brush up on the Policy for yourself so that I need not dictate it.
1. Is the submitter the original author of the piece, or does the work contain copy written material for which the deviant has not received permission, and has failed to manipulate to a necessary degree as to not infringe on copyright law? 2. Does the submission explicitly depict sexual acts?
3. Is the individual depicted over the age of 18?
4. Is the deviation done in good taste?
It's there in black and white.
-- ...a pathetic, adolescent fantasy which doesn't take into account the immense amount of responsibility and effort required to rule over an empire larger than any other.
--
Hey, next time you watch Who Framed Roger Rabbit, look at all the cartoons very carefully, you can see right through them :gasps: (only on the vhs version)
--
Chief Wiggum: Um, what does it say on my badge? Cash bribes only! Lets go.
This wasn't art, kiddo. It was trash.
"
He had submitted work that had previously been deleted by other admins, after many warnings. I don't think they will allow him back.
--
...a pathetic, adolescent fantasy which doesn't take into account the immense amount of responsibility and effort required to rule over an empire larger than any other.
`Prince-des-Sots, on the fallaciousness of world domination
A guy draws a fat purple hippoe and gets banned but someone can post bondage pics of pierced nipples and that's ok.
Maybe you better explain to me in plain english what's going on. Far be it from me to piss of the great DA gods, but it just seems to me that if the admins don't like you, they pretty much will fuck with you at their leisure.
And I'm just an observer. This is what I've seen. I know the story (Most of it to form my own opinion at any rate) and everything that I have ever learned about art is diffrent here. Am I wrong to belive that a persons interpretation of beauty or emotion or thought is wrong? Is there only one kind of appreation?
I myself write all kinds of thing. Some of the things I wrote are on the erotic end of the spectrum. But I do not see it as pornographic. I see it as an exercise in imagination whereby a charicter expresses sexuality. Is that wrong? If it is, then perhaps I could write about my breakfeast, me watching tv, playing video games, going to work. Mundane things everybody does. OR, perhaps I could write about cannabalisim, genocide, attrocities of war. Is THAT art?
The line is blurred here. There are people on both sides of that line that are confused about what is acceptable and what isn't. People are getting banned for the very same reason why art exists, exploring imagination. It just seems so wrong to me that people get banned for insipid things while other people continue to post things that, if posted by anyone else, would be considered pornographic.
What am I missing here?
[link]
and
[link]
Now, these make for an ill comparison, as the first depicts masturbation, correct? Which is a sexual act, not supported by Policy, is that not true? There is no argument there, as the second depicts no sexual act.
This shouldn't really require any more clarification...seems like a no-brainer to me. ;confused:
--
...a pathetic, adolescent fantasy which doesn't take into account the immense amount of responsibility and effort required to rule over an empire larger than any other.
`Prince-des-Sots, on the fallaciousness of world domination
I could post pictures of children being mutilated. I won't because I don't belive in it and to me it isn't art. But to someone else, it is.
Art is arbitrary.
Well, like I said I thought it was a no-brainer, clearly you didn't so I had to explain it a bit more simply. If you feel that this is insulting your intelligence then maybe you should just brush up on the Policy for yourself so that I need not dictate it.
1. Is the submitter the original author of the piece, or does the work contain copy written material for which the deviant has not received permission, and has failed to manipulate to a necessary degree as to not infringe on copyright law?
2. Does the submission explicitly depict sexual acts?
3. Is the individual depicted over the age of 18?
4. Is the deviation done in good taste?
It's there in black and white.
--
...a pathetic, adolescent fantasy which doesn't take into account the immense amount of responsibility and effort required to rule over an empire larger than any other.
`Prince-des-Sots, on the fallaciousness of world domination
Previous Page12345...Next Page